You just won’t believe how vastly, hugely, mind-bogglingly big it is…

A while ago L asked me what the biggest number I knew was. There are times when I start to regret that I gave her a semi-truthful answer. The mathematically accurate answer is, of course, that there is no biggest number, but this didn’t satisfy L. So instead I told her that the biggest number I knew was a googol. (The reason that this is only semi-true is that I actually also know what a googolplex is, but that is too big a number for me to contemplate for more than an instant). A googol, for those who don’t know, is 10 to the power 100 (written as 1 followed by a hundred zeros). Or, to put it differently, one hundred thousand trillion, trillion, trillion, trillion, trillion, trillion, trillion, trillion.

A googol is, therefore, a really big number. I sort of know this, but I still get flummoxed when I think about it. And I think about googols rather more than I used to, because L has taken to using the term. She, of course, is as the stage where ‘big number’ encompasses anything from about 50 upwards. She is also currently very keen on hypothetical questions. So just yesterday I got ‘what happens if we saw a googol of butterflies and every one was a different colour?’ And also (since we were going to feed the ducks): ‘what if there were a googol of ducklings in the river?’

I could provide a roughly coherent answer to both of these. Firstly, a lot of the butterflies would look the same colour, because there aren’t that many different colours. And a googol of ducklings wouldn’t fit in the river or even Hitchin. But afterwards, of course, I got to thinking about how many butterflies would be the same colour and how much space a googol of ducklings would take up. And that way lies madness (and mathematics, which tends towards the same thing). After some calculation, I came up with some very approximate answers.

Truecolor graphics gives about 16 million (= 1.6×107) different colours and approaches the limit at which the eye can detect differences. Therefore you’d be left with around 1092 butterflies of each minutely different colour. Which is a lot of butterflies.

As for the ducklings. Assuming that you have small ducklings, they might have a ‘footprint’ of around 5 cm x 5 cm. Since ducklings are quite happy squashing up together, you could then get 400 to a square metre. A square kilometre is a million square metres, so you could get 4×108 ducklings into that area. Then it starts to get hairy (or feathery). The earth’s radius is around 7000 km, so its surface area (4 pi x(radiius squared)) is about 6×108 square kilometres. If you covered the earth’s surface in ducklings, you’d therefore have around 2×1017 ducklings. For a whole googol of ducklings, you’d therefore need 5×1082 Earths (which is five hundred million, trillion, trillion, trillion, trillion, trillion, trillion, trillion).

At this point my mind goes woozy and I realise that I should have told L the biggest number I know is a trillion. All I hope is that she never asks me how many numbers there are between 0 and 1…

Advertisements

3 thoughts on “You just won’t believe how vastly, hugely, mind-bogglingly big it is…

  1. There’s an old answer to this, from Milo and the Phantom Tollbooth which I do heartily recommend for curious children. The largest number you know is actually that number (in this case a googol)… plus one. And then one more, and one more… And so on till you run out of zeros in your notation. And this is maybe the only useful way to approach the concept of infinity?

    Like

  2. I’ve tried the ‘there’s always a number one bigger’, but L’s not yet entirely convinced by that one. And I still have to work out whether to tell her my biggest mathematical secret when she’s older: that there is more than one size of infinity.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s